Pierre Curie- Finkbeiner Test

Most people who write about a women scientist follow a specific approach where the scientist is first described as a woman before being acknowledged as a scientist. In response, a series of rules were developed where the writing cannot include:

  • she’s a woman
  • her husband’s job
  • her child care situation
  • her nurturing nature
  • how she was surprised by competitiveness
  • how she’s a role model for other women
  • how she’s “the first woman to…”

One of my first FSL blog posts was about my idol since I was a little girl, Marie Curie. Although I had no intentions to, I also am guilty to have followed a similar approach. On Tuesday’s session, Catherine proposed an idea for the weekly blog post: to break all the rule of the Finkbeiner Test when writing about a male scientist.

Pierre Curie was born on May 15, 1859, to Sophie-Claire and Eugène Curie. Since a young age he demonstrated a strong aptitude for geometry and mathematics. When he was only 21, he and his older brother Jacque invented the Curie Scale, a highly sensitive instrument that provided precise measurements required for their experiments with electric potentiality. 

Image Source: Unknown Via Wikimedia

In 1984, Curie was introduced to Maria Sklodowska, whom he would marry one year later. Together, they worked on isolating polonium and radium. In 1903, they were awarded the prestigious Nobel Prize for their research regarding spontaneous radiation, thus becoming the husband of the first woman to win a Nobel Prize. 

Image Source: Unknown via Wikimedia

They have two daughters, Irène ( who would later earn a Nobel Prize in Chemistry) and Ève. On a busy rainy day in April 1906, while crossing the street, Curie slipped and was run over by a heavy carriage, crushing his skull and killing him instantly. He was 46 years old. 

. When doing this challenge, I felt I gave more emphasis on who Pierre Curie was rather than focusing on his great achievements and legacies. It allowed me to realize that female scientists are too often treated this way, but I had never previously given much thought to it. This exercise reinforced the idea that a scientist should have their scientific discoveries and contributions describe first and foremost, regardless of male or female.

 

Comments

  1. Thank you for talking about this very important subject. Your writing on Pierre Curie in this manner really sent the message home. It’s a shame that female scientists are usually written about in such limiting scope.
    Which scientists (besides Marie, who I agree is absolutely brilliant) do you find interesting?

Speak Your Mind

*